209 LearnersLast updated on May 26th, 2025
Divisibility Rule of 616
The divisibility rule is a way to find out whether a number is divisible by another number without using the division method. In real life, we can use the divisibility rule for quick math, dividing things evenly, and sorting things. In this topic, we will learn about the divisibility rule of 616.
What is the Divisibility Rule of 616?
The divisibility rule for 616 is a method by which we can find out if a number is divisible by 616 or not without using the division method. Check whether 7392 is divisible by 616 with the divisibility rule.
Step 1: Check if the number is divisible by 8 and 77. This is because 616 = 8 × 77.
Step 2: For divisibility by 8, check the last three digits of the number. If they form a number divisible by 8, then the number is divisible by 8. Here, the last three digits of 7392 are 392, and 392 ÷ 8 = 49 with no remainder, so 7392 is divisible by 8.
Step 3: For divisibility by 77, check if the number is divisible by both 7 and 11. Use the divisibility rules for 7 and 11 to verify. For 7, using the divisibility rule, 7392 gives 7 + 3 × 2 - 9 = 2, which is divisible by 7. For 11, the alternating sum of the digits is 7 - 3 + 9 - 2 = 11, which is divisible by 11.
Step 4: Since 7392 is divisible by both 8 and 77, it is divisible by 616.
Tips and Tricks for Divisibility Rule of 616
Learning the divisibility rule will help kids master division. Let’s learn a few tips and tricks for the divisibility rule of 616.
- Know the factors of 616: Memorize that 616 = 8 × 77 to easily remember the divisibility rule.
- Verify divisibility by smaller numbers: First, check if the number is divisible by 8 and 77 separately.
- Use known divisibility rules: Apply known rules for divisibility, such as those for 8, 7, and 11.
- Repeat the process for large numbers: Students should keep repeating the divisibility process with smaller components (like 8 and 77) until they verify divisibility.
- Use the division method to verify: Students can use the division method to verify and crosscheck their results, which will help them learn and confirm their answers.
Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them in Divisibility Rule of 616
The divisibility rule of 616 helps us quickly check if the given number is divisible by 616, but common mistakes like calculation errors lead to incorrect conclusions. Here, we will understand some common mistakes and how to avoid them.
Mistake 1
Not checking divisibility by 8 and 77 separately.
Always check divisibility by both 8 and 77 to confirm divisibility by 616.
Mistake 2
Forgetting the rule for divisibility by 8.
Remember to check the last three digits of the number for divisibility by 8.
Mistake 3
Ignoring divisibility by 77.
Apply the divisibility rules for both 7 and 11 to confirm divisibility by 77.
Mistake 4
Not repeating the process when necessary.
Continue checking divisibility for each component factor until confirmed for both 8 and 77.
Mistake 5
Confusing the steps.
Practice regularly to avoid confusion and memorize the steps for checking divisibility by 8 and 77.
Divisibility Rule of 616 Examples
Problem 1
Is 1232 divisible by 616?
Yes, 1232 is divisible by 616.
Explanation
To determine if 1232 is divisible by 616, we check if dividing 1232 by 616 results in a whole number.
1) Divide the number 1232 by 616: 1232 ÷ 616 = 2.
2) Since the result is a whole number, 1232 is divisible by 616.
Problem 2
Check the divisibility rule of 616 for 1848.
Yes, 1848 is divisible by 616.
Explanation
To check if 1848 is divisible by 616, we follow these steps:
1) Divide 1848 by 616: 1848 ÷ 616 = 3.
2) As the result is a whole number, 1848 is divisible by 616.
Problem 3
Is -3080 divisible by 616?
Yes, -3080 is divisible by 616.
Explanation
To verify if -3080 is divisible by 616, we can ignore the negative sign and check divisibility:
1) Divide 3080 by 616: 3080 ÷ 616 = 5.
2) The result is a whole number, so -3080 is divisible by 616.
Problem 4
Can 700 be divisible by 616 following the divisibility rule?
No, 700 is not divisible by 616.
Explanation
To determine if 700 is divisible by 616, we proceed with the division:
1) Divide 700 by 616: 700 ÷ 616 ≈ 1.136.
2) The result is not a whole number, indicating that 700 is not divisible by 616.
Problem 5
Check the divisibility rule of 616 for 2464.
Yes, 2464 is divisible by 616.
Explanation
To verify if 2464 is divisible by 616, follow these steps:
1) Divide 2464 by 616: 2464 ÷ 616 = 4.
2) Since the result is a whole number, 2464 is divisible by 616.
FAQs on Divisibility Rule of 616
1.What is the divisibility rule for 616?
2.Is 1232 divisible by 616?
3.How do you check divisibility by 8?
4.How do you check divisibility by 77?
5.Does the divisibility rule of 616 apply to negative numbers?
6.How can children in India use numbers in everyday life to understand Divisibility Rule of 616?
7.What are some fun ways kids in India can practice Divisibility Rule of 616 with numbers?
8.What role do numbers and Divisibility Rule of 616 play in helping children in India develop problem-solving skills?
9.How can families in India create number-rich environments to improve Divisibility Rule of 616 skills?
Important Glossaries for Divisibility Rule of 616
- Divisibility rule: A set of rules used to determine if one number is divisible by another without performing full division.
- Factors: Numbers that multiply together to form another number. For example, 8 and 77 are factors of 616.
- Multiples: The result of multiplying a number by an integer. For example, multiples of 616 include 616, 1232, 1848, etc.
- Integers: Whole numbers that include positive numbers, negative numbers, and zero.
- Subtraction: A mathematical operation that involves taking one quantity away from another.
Explore More numbers
About BrightChamps in India
Hiralee Lalitkumar Makwana
About the Author
Hiralee Lalitkumar Makwana has almost two years of teaching experience. She is a number ninja as she loves numbers. Her interest in numbers can be seen in the way she cracks math puzzles and hidden patterns.
Fun Fact
: She loves to read number jokes and games.
